This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
AMI PORT examines regional variations in heart attack
treatments and outcomes and the use of angiography in
elderly patients
Each year at least 750,000 Americans have an acute myocardial
infarction (AMI). Medicare patients, who account for nearly half
of these cases, have a cumulative mortality of 40 percent. The
Harvard-based AMI Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT), led by
Barbara J. McNeil, M.D., Ph.D., and supported by the Agency for
Health Care Policy and Research (HS06341), recently published the
following two studies, which examine regional variations in the
use of invasive cardiac procedures and coronary angiography in
elderly heart attack patients.
Guadagnoli, E., Hauptman, P.J., and Ayanian, J.Z. (1995).
"Variation in the use of cardiac procedures after acute
myocardial infarction." The New England Journal of
Medicine 333, pp. 573-578.
Physicians in Texas are more likely to perform invasive cardiac
procedures on heart attack patients than physicians in New York.
However, Texas' high-technology approach does not improve
patients' survival or quality of life compared with patients in
New York, according to AMI PORT researchers.
They studied elderly Medicare patients with heart attacks who
were admitted to 478 hospitals in New York and Texas during 1990
and found that the patterns of treatment for clinically similar
patients were quite different in the two States. Coronary
angiography, a procedure that images heart blood vessels to
detect heart problems, was performed more often in Texas than in
New York (45 percent vs. 30 percent). In Texas, the overall rate
of coronary artery bypass surgery was 15 percent, and the rate of
coronary angioplasty was 15 percent, compared with 13 percent and
7 percent in New York, respectively. Nevertheless, over the
2-year period following a heart attack, the adjusted likelihood
of death was lower in New York than in Texas, and 2 years after a
heart attack, patients from Texas were 41 percent more likely
than New York patients to report angina and 62 percent more
likely to be unable to perform activities requiring energy
expenditures of 5 or more metabolic equivalents.
Gatsonis, G.A., Epstein, A.M., Newhouse, J.P., and others
(1995). "Variations in the utilization of coronary angiography
for elderly patents with an acute myocardial infarction." Medical Care
33(6), pp. 625-642.
Regions of the United States vary three-fold in their use of
coronary angiography in Medicare patients 65 years of age or
older who have suffered a heart attack. Elderly patients who are
male, younger (between 65 and 74 years of age), non-black
(especially in the Southeast), and live in States with ready
availability of angiography, are more likely than other elderly
patients to undergo this procedure to detect heart damage
following a heart attack, according to AMI PORT researchers.
Coronary angiography uses contrast dye, inserted into the
coronary arteries via a catheter, to visualize the arteries. Use
of this diagnostic technique was lowest in the Northeastern part
of the United States and ranged from 13.8 percent of AMI Medicare
patients in Rhode Island to 38.3 percent in Montana. States with
more hospitals having on-site angiography capability tended to
have higher angiography rates after adjusting for patient
characteristics and geographic region. On average, adjusted
angiography rates were higher for younger Medicare patients,
males, and non-blacks. The odds of blacks receiving angiography
compared with whites ranged from a low of 0.41 (less than half
the chance) in Mississippi to 0.94 (almost equal chance) in
Kansas.
These results show that large variations in the use of procedures
can exist, despite uniform insurance coverage and a relatively
homogeneous patient population, points out Barbara J. McNeil,
M.D., Ph.D., of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's
Hospital. Dr. McNeil and her colleagues studied claims and
administrative data from the Health Care Financing Administration
to identify a group of Medicare patients 65 years of age and
older who had a heart attack in 1987. They estimated the
probability of angiography during the first 90 days following a
heart attack based on patient age, sex, race, and coexisting
conditions for patients in 50 States and the District of
Columbia.
Recent findings from the Ischemic Heart Disease PORT
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the primary cause of death
and a major cause of morbidity in the United States. Significant
clinical manifestations of CAD are seen in one of every three men
and one of every 10 women by the age of 60. CAD causes the
majority of cases of ischemic heart disease (IHD) wherein there
is an insufficient flow of blood to the heart and consequent high
risk of heart attack (infarction). The Ischemic Heart Disease
Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) is a 5-year study supported
by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research that is
designed to assess the effectiveness of various surgical and
nonsurgical treatments of ischemic heart disease.
Led by Elizabeth R. DeLong, Ph.D., of Duke University Medical
Center, the Ischemic Heart Disease PORT (HS06503) was awarded by
AHCPR in July 1990 in an effort to find ways to reduce treatment
variations and improve the survival and quality of life of
patients suffering from heart disease. The following three
studies were published recently by members of the Ischemic Heart
Disease PORT.
Burnett, R.L., Blumenthal, J.A., Mark, D.B., and others (1995).
"Distinguishing between early and late responders to symptoms of
acute myocardial infarction." The American Journal of Cardiology 75, pp. 1019-1022.
It is well known that the earlier persons with heart attack
symptoms call for medical help, the better their chances of
survival. Why do certain individuals wait hours, while others
call within minutes? Certain psychological and situational
factors play a role, according to a study by members of the
Ischemic Heart Disease PORT. The team analyzed questionnaire
responses of 501 hospitalized patients with documented acute
myocardial infarction (AMI), who were similar in illness severity
and demographic profile. Early responders (204) averaged 20
minutes to request medical assistance, whereas late responders
(249) waited an average of nearly 5-1/2 hours before seeking
medical help.
Persons who believed their symptoms were serious and involved the
heart were more likely to request medical assistance early,
whereas those who attributed their symptoms to indigestion,
muscle pain, fatigue, or another cause responded later. Early
responders also were more anxious or upset when they first
noticed symptoms, felt they had little control over the symptoms,
and were more comfortable seeking medical assistance than late
responders. Late responders were more likely to be unmarried and
to experience their symptoms at work rather than elsewhere,
suggesting that they may have been more hesitant to call for help
from their office than their home.
Public education campaigns to reduce heart attack deaths have
focused on how to recognize symptoms and contact the emergency
medical system. However, this study suggests that these programs
may achieve better results by focusing on emotional factors that
may delay calls for help and ways to distinguish heart attack
symptoms from indigestion, muscle pain, and other problems.
Mark, D.B., Hlatky, M.A., Califf, R.M., and others (1995). "Cost
effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen
activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial
infarction." The New England Journal of Medicine 332(21),
pp. 1418-1424.
AMI is caused by blockage of the coronary arteries and rapid
onset of damage to the heart muscle. It is what most people think
of as a "heart attack."
The benefit of treating patients with AMI with thrombolytic
(clot-dissolving) drugs to open blocked arteries is well
established. Accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)
costs more but results in a higher survival rate than
streptokinase, according to a new study by the Ischemic Heart
Disease PORT. Accelerated t-PA is given over a period of 1-1/2
hours rather than the conventional 3 hours, and two-thirds of the
dose is given in the first 30 minutes.
The research team conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to
compare the value of these two thrombolytic treatments based on
information on mortality rates and use of health resources from
the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen
Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) study. One year
after enrollment, patients who received t-PA had both higher
costs ($2,845) and a higher survival rate (an increase of 1.1
percent or 11 per 1,000 patients treated). Based on the projected
life expectancy of each treatment group, the incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio was $32,678 per year of life saved.
This cost compares favorably with the cost of other therapies
judged by society to be worthwhile, according to the PORT
researchers. The researchers conclude that the routine
substitution of accelerated t-PA for streptokinase in the
treatment of the approximately 250,000 eligible patients who have
AMI in the United States each year would cost the Nation
approximately $500 million each year. However, this treatment
would also provide 38,000 additional years of life for patients
after AMI.
Hunink, M.G., Wong, J.B., Donaldson, M.C., and others (1995,
July). "Revascularization of femoropopliteal disease." Journal
of the American Medical Association 274(2), pp. 165-171.
Femoropopliteal disease is a common co-morbid condition in
patients suffering from heart disease. It is caused when
peripheral arteries in the leg become blocked (occluded), and
circulation of blood is significantly reduced. Many patients who
suffer from this disorder eventually require amputation of the
affected leg.
Two procedures used to restore flow of blood to the leg are
percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bypass surgery
(BS). Both treatments are generally considered to be effective in
treating leg ischemia and occluded leg arteries in patients with
peripheral arterial disease. Both procedures have been shown to
decrease the number of amputations in these patients.
The optimum revascularization procedure, however, remains
debatable. A new study by the Ischemic Heart Disease PORT
concludes that angioplasty is the preferred initial treatment in
patients with disabling claudication (limp or walk with pain) due
to stenosis (narrowing) or occlusion of the femoropopliteal
artery in the thigh, and in those with chronic critical ischemia
and stenosis. Bypass surgery is the preferred initial treatment
in patients with critical ischemia and a femoropopliteal
occlusion.
Using data combined from 26 studies on PTA and BS, the
investigators constructed a model to simulate a hypothetical
cohort of patients receiving these procedures. The model
"followed" these patients over time to estimate long-term
outcomes of each treatment in terms of mortality, morbidity,
patency (degree to which an artery is open), and costs.
PORT researchers estimated life expectancy for 65-year-old men
with peripheral arterial disease to range from 2.7 to 7.4
quality-adjusted life years. Analysis showed that for 65-year-old
men with (1) femoropopliteal stenosis presenting with either
disabling claudication or critical ischemia or (2)
femoropopliteal occlusion presenting with disabling claudication,
initial angioplasty increased quality-adjusted life expectancy by
2 to 13 months and resulted in decreased lifetime expenditures
compared with bypass surgery. For patients with critical ischemia
and a femoropopliteal occlusion, initial bypass surgery increased
quality-adjusted life expectancy by 1 to 4 months and resulted in
decreased lifetime expenditures compared with angioplasty.
Three-rescuer CPR shown to be more effective than standard
two-rescuer CPR
Many urban emergency medical systems dispatch the nearest fire
engine company to begin "first-response" cardiopulmonary
resuscitation (CPR) until paramedics can reach the scene.
Three-rescuer CPR should be adopted as the method of choice by
first-response engine companies with three or more trained
rescuers, concludes a study supported by the Agency for Health
Care Policy and Research (HS06094). The study, led by Arthur L.
Kellermann, M.D., M.P.H., of Emory University, shows that three
firefighters can perform CPR more effectively than two
firefighters, when they use a bag-valve-mask device, and the
three-person technique is easily learned and remembered.
The researchers compared the performance of Memphis firefighters
who were trained in the three-person technique with that of
firefighters who received refresher training in standard
two-rescuer CPR. Most firefighters use a bag-valve-mask or
oxygen-powered resuscitator to provide rescue ventilations in the
field, partly due to fear of disease transmission during
mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-mask ventilation. However, unassisted
ventilation with a bag-valve-mask is difficult to perform and can
result in the victim receiving insufficient oxygen.
The three-rescuer technique overcomes this problem: one rescuer
opens the victim's airway and forms a tight mask-to-face seal
with both hands. The second rescuer ventilates the victim with
the bag-valve device, while the third rescuer performs standard
chest compressions. Three-rescuer teams had more success than
two-rescuer teams in achieving every action considered crucial
for adequate rescue ventilation: proper head tilt (53 percent vs.
25 percent), adequate mask-to-mouth seal (75 percent vs. 37
percent), and delivery of full breaths (67 percent vs. 35
percent). They were able to deliver more breaths per minute and
more oxygen per breath than two-rescuer teams, which resulted in
an average of 60 percent more oxygen per minute to the victim.
More details are in "Three-rescuer CPR: The method of choice for
firefighter CPR?" by Bela B. Hackman, M.D., Dr. Kellermann, Patty
Everitt, R.N., and Linda Carpenter, M.D., in the Annals of
Emergency Medicine 26(1), pp. 25-30, 1995.
Stroke PORT publishes latest findings
Stroke is a major cause of disability and the third leading cause
of death in the United States. Ischemic stroke and transient
ischemic attack (TIA, a mini stroke, usually lasting a few
minutes without residual symptoms) account for 67 percent of
cerebrovascular disease. Current practices to manage acute stroke
are limited in their ability to reduce associated disabilities,
which range from paralysis to depression and impaired thinking.
Therefore, much effort is directed at stroke prevention, the goal
of the Secondary and Tertiary Prevention of Stroke Patient
Outcomes Research Team (PORT), supported by the Agency for Health
Care Policy and Research (Contract 282-91-0028) and led by David
Matchar, M.D., of Duke University Medical Center.
The Stroke PORT recently published two studies. The first study
presents theories about why, even though African-Americans
experience more severe strokes resulting in greater disability
than whites, they are less likely than whites to undergo carotid
endarterectomy, a surgical procedure that is effective in
preventing ischemic stroke. The second study points out variation
in the availability and use of specialized stroke prevention
services.
Horner, R.D., Oddone, E.Z, and Matchar, D.B. (1995). "Theories
explaining racial differences in the utilization of diagnostic
and therapeutic procedures for cerebrovascular disease."
The Milbank Quarterly 73(3), pp. 443-462.
Carotid endarterectomy, which involves the removal of plaque
deposits from the carotid artery, is the only surgical procedure
known to prevent stroke. It is usually reserved for patients with
70 percent or greater blockage in an operable location within the
carotid artery. Despite being at higher risk for ischemic stroke,
African-American patients are substantially less likely than
white patients to undergo this procedure. In this report, the
researchers discuss three widely recognized alternative
explanations to racial bias that could account for disparities in
the use of carotid endarterectomy. These include (1) racial
differences in important clinical factors related to the
appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy, such as the extent
and location of carotid artery stenosis, comorbid conditions, and
differences in operative risk; (2) the ability to pay, regardless
of race, may explain variations in the use of expensive
diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; and (3) differences along
racial lines in patients' decisions to undergo invasive
procedures.
Dramatic racial differences have been observed in the use of
effective invasive therapies for cerebrovascular disease. The
researchers note that available evidence is insufficient to
exclude racial discrimination as an explanation for these
differences. They conclude that additional studies are needed to
clarify the importance of alternative explanations for the
observed variations.
Goldstein, L.B., Bonito, A.J., Matchar, D.B., and others (1995,
September). "US national survey of physician practices for the
secondary and tertiary prevention of ischemic stroke."
Stroke 26, pp. 1607-1615.
The stroke PORT conducted a national survey of stroke prevention
practices among a stratified random sample of 2,000 physicians.
The survey included questions regarding availability of stroke
prevention services and use of diagnostic and preventive
strategies for patients at elevated risk of stroke. Survey
results showed that physician-perceived availability of stroke
prevention services varied with type of physician (specialist,
such as neurologist, vs. primary care physician) and practice
setting (nonmetropolitan vs. small metropolitan or large
metropolitan area). Perceived availability of carotid
endarterectomy also varied by region of the country. For example,
the odds of carotid endarterectomy being reported as readily
available were approximately 2.5 to 3.5 times greater for
physicians practicing in regions other than the South, which
ironically has been dubbed the "Stroke Belt" due to the high
number of these events occurring in this part of the country.
Diagnostic studies considered readily available by at least 90
percent of physicians included carotid ultrasonography,
transthor-acic echocardiography, Holter monitoring, computerized
tomo-graphy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. MR
angiography was perceived as being readily available by 68
percent and transesophageal echocardiography by 74 percent of
physicians; 12 percent reported cerebral arteriography and 10
percent reported carotid endarterectomy as not being readily
available.
Physicians also varied in their use of stroke prevention
practices. About 61 percent of physicians reported prescribing
daily doses of 325 mg of aspirin for stroke prevention, 33
percent recommended less than 325 mg, and 4 percent used doses of
650 mg or more. Eighty percent of physicians monitored patients
on anticoagulant (blood-thinning) therapy at least once a month,
whereas 14 percent of physicians monitored these patients less
often.
Researchers examine outcomes of back pain treatments
provided by chiropractors, surgeons, and general physicians
Patients with acute low back pain have similar recoveries,
whether they are treated by primary care practitioners,
chiropractors, or orthopedic surgeons. But, they pay
substantially more for treatments provided by chiropractors and
surgeons and are most satisfied with the care chiropractors
provide, according to a study supported by the Agency for Health
Care Policy and Research (HS06664). University of North Carolina
researchers, led by Timothy S. Carey, M.D., compared the outcomes
of treatment provided by 208 practitioners (including
chiropractors, orthopedic surgeons, and primary care physicians)
in North Carolina for more than 1,500 people who sought care for
acute low back pain.
Regardless of which type of health practitioner treated them,
about 70 percent of patients had recovered completely within 6
months. The rest continued to be bothered by back pain, but only
5 percent were unable to function as well as they had before the
pain began. Outpatient charges were highest for patients seen by
orthopedic surgeons and chiropractors and lowest for patients
seen by primary care physicians in health maintenance
organizations (HMOs) and other primary care providers.
Patients visiting chiropractors made two to three times as many
visits as those being treated by primary care doctors (15 and 10
visits for urban and rural chiropractors, respectively, vs. fewer
than 5 visits to primary care doctors). Also, orthopedists and
chiropractors used more x-rays, with orthopedists ordering
x-rays for 72 percent of their patients. In contrast, patients
visiting HMO doctors had a mean of 3.1 visits, and only 19
percent had x-rays.
As a result, the charge for treating an episode of back pain was
about $808 for patients of urban chiropractors and $809 for
patients who saw orthopedic surgeons. The charge for treatment
from family doctors averaged $478 for urban doctors and $540 for
rural doctors. Yet 42 percent of patients treated by
chiropractors rated their treatment "excellent" compared with
less than 27 percent of those treated by medical doctors.
Patients particularly liked the way chiropractors took their
health histories, examined them, and explained the cause of their
pain.
See "The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among
patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and
orthopedic surgeons," by Dr. Carey, Joanne Garrett, Ph.D., Anne
Jackman, M.S.W., and others, in the October 5, 1995 issue of
The New England Journal of Medicine 333, pp. 913-917.
PORT researchers examine prenatal zinc supplementation
and other factors affecting birthweight
The Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) on Low Birthweight in
Minority and High-Risk Women, supported by the Agency for Health
Care Policy and Research (contract 282-92-0055) examines ways to
prevent low birthweight and improve the outcomes of
low-birthweight infants. Led by Robert L. Goldenberg, M.D., of
the University of Alabama, PORT researchers recently published
findings on prenatal zinc supplementation, use of prenatal
corticosteroids, the costs/benefits of screening for bacterial
infections in asymptomatic pregnant women, and the role of low
self-esteem and other psychosocial factors in low birthweight.
Goldenberg, R.L., Tsunenobu, T., Neggers, Y., and others (1995,
August 9). "The effect of zinc supplementation on pregnancy
outcome." Journal of the American Medical Association 274(6), pp. 463-468.
The use of zinc supplements in pregnant women whose blood zinc
levels are low early in pregnancy is known to have beneficial
effects, including increased birthweight for their infants.
Supplementation seems to have a greater impact on the infants of
women whose body mass index (BMI, ratio of weight to height) is
low, according to the Low Birthweight PORT researchers. These
findings are based on a study of 580 poor black pregnant women
whose plasma zinc levels were below the median when they began
prenatal care. They were randomized to receive either a daily
dose of 25 mg of zinc or a placebo until delivery. Infants born
to women in the zinc-supplemented group weighed 126 grams more at
birth and had a 0.4 cm larger head circumference than infants in
the placebo group. In women with a low BMI, zinc supplementation
was associated with a 248-gram higher infant birthweight and a
0.7 cm larger infant head circumference.
Leviton, L.C., Baker, S., Hassol, A., and Goldenberg, R. (1995,
July). "An exploration of opinion and practice patterns affecting
low use of antenatal corticosteroids." American Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynecology 173(1), pp. 312-316.
Despite the evidence that prenatal administration of
corticosteroids reduces death and problems such as respiratory
distress syndrome in preterm infants, only 20 percent of mothers
who deliver preterm newborns receive corticosteroids. In this
study, PORT researchers examined why obstetricians still underuse
corticosteroids. Based on individual interviews and focus groups,
they found that obstetricians and maternal-fetal specialists vary
widely in their view of the risks and benefits of prenatal
corticosteroids. Obstetricians tend to focus on feared negative
consequences, for example, that corticosteroid therapy might
disguise the early signs of infection, especially in the case of
premature rupture of membranes. Neonatologists, on the other
hand, who see the positive and negative outcomes for all infants,
believe the therapy's risks are negligible and far outweighed by
demonstrated benefits.
Bronstein, J.M., and Goldenberg, R.L. (1995, July). "Practice
variation in the use of corticosteroids: A comparison of eight
data sets." American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
173(1), pp. 296-298.
Use of prenatal corticosteroids for women in premature labor
increased dramatically in the United States during the past
decade, from a low of 8.1 percent in the early 1980s to 26
percent in the early 1990s. PORT researchers examined eight
databases to identify consistencies in this pattern of
corticosteroid use. Analysis showed that, although physicians
vary widely in their use of prenatal corticosteroids, they do
agree on a few appropriate uses. For example, corticosteroid
therapy is used more frequently for multiple births and much less
frequently in infants less than 28 weeks gestation or older than
31 weeks. The therapy is used more often when delivery is by
cesarean section and when tocolytic agents (which inhibit uterine
contractions during labor) are used.
Atkinson, M.W., Goldenberg, R.L., Gaudier, F.L., and others.
(1995, July). "Maternal corticosteroid and tocolytic treatment
and morbidity and mortality in very low birth weight infants."
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 173(1),
pp. 299-304.
Very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants (weighing less than 3 pounds)
born to women with any prenatal treatment with corticosteroids
have a 50 percent lower risk of neonatal death, 65 percent lower
risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, 70 percent lower risk of
severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and 60 percent lower risk of
seizures than other VLBW infants. Conversely, VLBW infants whose
mothers receive tocolytics to inhibit uterine contractions during
labor are more than twice as likely as other VLBW infants to
experience intraventricular hemorrhage. The numbers of neonatal
deaths and seizures are significantly reduced when women are
given tocolytics in combination with prenatal corticosteroids.
These findings are based on a retrospective study of labor and
delivery records from 773 live births at the University of
Alabama at Birmingham hospitals from 1979 to 1991. The infants
were born between 24 to 28 weeks' gestation and weighed 500 to
1,000 grams.
Rouse, D.J., Andrews, W.W., Goldenberg, R.L., and Owen, J. (1995,
July). "Screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria of
pregnancy to prevent pyelonephritis: A cost-effectiveness and
cost-benefit analysis." Obstetrics & Gynecology 86(1), pp. 119-123.
Depending on the patient population, 2-10 percent of pregnant
women have an asymptomatic bacterial infection at their initial
prenatal visit. Without antimicrobial treatment, as many as 30
percent of these women will develop symptomatic urinary tract
infections during pregnancy, usually in the form of
pyelonephritis (kidney infection sometimes due to obstruction
from an enlarged uterus). PORT researchers found that, regardless
of whether dipstick or urine culture is used, screening is
cost-beneficial compared with a policy of no screening for the
prevention of pyelonephritis in pregnancy. No screening resulted
in 23.2 cases per 1,000 pregnancies, versus 16.2 cases with
dipstick and 11.2 with urine culture. The cost of screening and
treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria per 1,000 pregnancies was
$1,968 with dipstick and $19,264 with culture. These results were
based on a decision analytic model that compared the two
screening strategies with each other and to a policy of no
screening.
Hickey, C.A., Cliver, S.P., Goldenberg, R.L., and others (1995,
August). "Relationship of psychosocial status to low prenatal
weight gain among nonobese black and white women delivering at
term." Obstetrics & Gynecology 86(2), pp. 177-183.
PORT researchers examined the relationship between psychosocial
well-being (anxiety trait, subjective stress, mastery or sense of
control over events, self-esteem, and social support) and low
prenatal weight gain among 806 nonobese, high-risk, low-income
black and white women who delivered at term from 1985 to 1988.
White women in this study who experienced anxiety, depression,
and low self-esteem were more apt to gain too little weight
during pregnancy, but these psychosocial factors did not affect
weight gain among black women in the study, according to the
researchers. Women who were depressed gained 2.26 kg less than
those who were not depressed, and those with high levels of trait
anxiety gained 1.69 kg less than women with low levels.
Conversely, women with high self-esteem gained 1.94 kg more than
those with low self-esteem, women with a high level of social
support gained 2.26 kg more than those with a low level, and
women with a high level of mastery gained 2 kg more than those
with a low mastery level.
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section