Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Appendix B: Final Literature Review—Appendix C. Additional Extraction Table

Design and Evaluation of Three Administration on Aging (AoA) Programs: Chronic Disease Self-Management Program Evaluation Design—Final Evaluation Design Report (continued)

Article # Citation Fidelity to Stanford CDSMP Randomization Notes Site Information Screening Country / Region
1 Ahmed & Villagra (2006) no stated modifications non-random 10 sites none specified, selection favored those with diabetes Chicago, Kansas, Dallas, Houston, Denver, Mid-Atlantic, Nashville, Florida, Ohio, Tri-state
3 Barlow, Turner, et al (2009) CDSMP implemented by NHS, with lay leaders MS patients randomized to treatment of control; also followed group of informed nonattenders 12 courses; # sites & geographical spread not specified Multiple Sclerosis patients England
4 Barlow, Wright, et al (2005) CDSMP implemented by NHS, with lay leaders non-random   none specified England
7 Bedell (2008) Modified version of CDSMP for work transition & self-management skills for HIV/AIDS patients. non-random The study took place at MTS, a job skills training program for persons with HIV/AIDS This study is for persons with HIV/AIDS who are in work transition. New York City
12 Ersek, Turner et al (2008) Modified CDSMP program for PAIN Recruitment from 43 retirement communities. 36 facilities were randomized & 7 facilities randomized individually 43 retirement communities Exclusion criteria were active cancer or surgery next 6 months Puget Sound area of Washington State
14 Gitlin, Chernett, et al (2008) Modified for urban older African Americans in Philadelphia, delivered by a senior center. named Harvest Health. non-random 38 course conducted over 3 years older African Americans Philadelphia, PA
15 Goeppinger , Armstrong et al (2007) CDSMP & Arthritis Self-help Course (ASHC). Only one or the other was administered to a participant. They were modified for cultural acceptability. Randomization at group level to receive CDSMP or another Arthritis specific program. Not randomized within program 48 workshops; # sites not specified none specified; predominantly African American Southeastern U.S.; 12 counties in eastern North Carolina
17 Haas, Groupp, et al (2005) no stated modifications Participants randomized to receive workshop immediately (treatment) or wait for 6 months (control group) 12 sites (OASIS institute, 2 YMCAS, 5 senior residences, 1 community center, 1 church African American or White, aged 60+, suffer from chronic LBP, ability to read & write English. Exclusion: dementia, significant heart or respiratory illness, serious blood disorders, participation in another health program, unwillingness to be randomized. not specified. In U.S.
19 Jerant, Moore-Hill et al (2009) Used Homing in on Health (HioH), a CDSMP variant Randomized into control, and treatment at home or telephone Those receiving treatment by home and telephone compared to control; recruitment through 12 physician offices Ability to speak & read English; residence in home with telephone; adequate hearing and eyesight; at least 1 activity impairments northern California
21 Kendall, Catalano, et al (2007) Modified CDSMP for recent stroke patients Stroke patients randomized to treatment and control single hospital stroke patients southeast Australia
22 Kennedy, Reeves, et al (2007) CDSMP implemented by NHS, with lay leaders Randomized on participant level National: Recruitment by 28 strategic health authorities none specified England
24 Lorig, Ritter et al (2001) no stated modifications non-random not-specified none specified US
25 Lorig, Ritter, et al (2008) Online version of EPP (Expert Patients Programme), based on the CDSMP non-random online exclusion: treatment for cancer, being pregnant England
26 Lorig, Ritter, Gonzalez, et al (2003) Spanish-language version called Tomando Control de Su Salud: not direct translation, cultural modifications Participants randomized to treatment and wait listed control 58 programs targeted Hispanic population northern California
27 Lorig, Ritter, Jacquez, et al (2005) Spanish-language version called Tomando Control de Su Salud: not direct translation, cultural modifications non-random 31 Spanish programs/ 13 English programs 1+ chronic condition & 18+ Texas, New Mexico, & Chihuahua, Mexico
28 Lorig, Ritter, Laurent, et al (2006) Online version of CDSMP Participants randomized to intervention group (online + usual care) or control group (usual care only) online exclusion: treatment for cancer, previous participation in CDSMP Not specified. But somewhere in US.
29 Lorig, Ritter, Plant, et al (2005) Compared Arthritis Self-Management Program (ASMP) & generic CDSMP. Two-thirds randomized for disease specific Arthritis SMP not mentioned exclusion: previous participation in ASMP or CDSMP San Francisco Bay Area
30 Lorig, Sobel, Stewart, et al (1999) no stated modifications Participants randomized serially. After all subjects had applied to a specific site, the randomization ratio (treatment versus controls) was determined to assure 10-15 treatment subjects. multiple community sites in 4 county area exclusion: patients with compromised mentation; cancer patients San Francisco Bay Area
31 Lorig, Sobel, Ritter, et al (2001) no stated modifications non-random 21 sites (8 in Northern California, 6 in Southern California, 1 in Ohio, 1 in Georgia, 3 in Colorado, & 1 in Seattle none specified Seven KP Regions
32 Nolte, Elsworth, et al (2007) Fidelity to CDSMP not specifically mentioned. non-random National: multiple programs, offered by lay leaders & health professionals, none specified Australia
34 Powers, Olsen, et al (2009) Modified CDSMP program delivered by nurses via phone Randomization at provider & patient level. Primary care providers randomized to receive computer decision support or usual care. Hypertension patients hypertension randomized to nurse telephone support or usual care. 3 sites: conducted at Durham VA Medical Center none specified Durham, NC
38 Rose, Arenson, et al (2008) Adapted to low-income urban African-Americans non-random A variety of community sites, including senior citizen centers, senior housing for people with lower incomes, and churches Low-income urban African Americans Philadelphia, PA
41 Smeulders, van Haastregt, et al (2009) no stated modifications Patient level randomization to intervention or control Recruitment from 6 hospitals & 21 CDSMP classes Congestive Heart Failure patients, able to write, and speak Dutch Netherlands
42 Sobel, Lorig, & Hobbs (2002) no stated modifications RCT follow-up not specified Kaiser Permanent (KP) patients Nine KP Regions
43 Swerissen, Belfrage, et al (2006) CDSMP modified by participants first language (Vietnamese, Chinese, Italian or Greek) Participants randomized to intervention and waitlisted control groups multiple sites in single state of Australia People from Vietnamese, Chinese, Italian and Greek backgrounds suffering from chronic conditions. From low income areas. Australia

Return to Appendix B Contents
Return to Report Contents
Proceed to Next Section

Page last reviewed December 2014
Page originally created May 2011
Internet Citation: Appendix B: Final Literature Review—Appendix C. Additional Extraction Table. Content last reviewed December 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/aoa/aoachronic-apbc.html

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care