This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Practice Reflections & Perceptions of MOSOPS-Process, Value, and Potential Use
Slide 7. What worked best or didn't work for distribution and collection of surveys in your medical offices? (PBRN)

- Face-to-face meetings with Point of Contact and staff worked best overall.
- It worked best to go there and introduce the survey. Staff took time to complete it while we were there—more direct accountability to get it done.
- I think it would have been better if I had gone out to the clinics to deliver the surveys in person. There were delays in getting the survey done in clinics where we mailed the surveys.
- Follow up with Points of Contact using E-mails and phone calls was helpful.
- Having food for the offices was very helpful and increased participation given that most often we had surveys completed over lunch.
- A good presentation to staff and time for questions ensured a higher response rate.
Previous Slide Contents Next Slide
Page last reviewed May 2011
Internet Citation: Practice Reflections & Perceptions of MOSOPS-Process, Value, and Potential Use: Slide 7. What worked best or didn't work for distribution and collection of surveys in your medical offices? (PBRN).
May 2011. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/medical-office/2011/fagnantacall/fagnantacallsl7.html