Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Regional Extension Centers (REC) Reported Practice Level Challenges to Achieving Meaningful Use

AHRQ's 2012 Annual Conference Slide Presentation

On September 10, 2012, Dawn Heisey-Grove made this presentation at the 2012 Annual Conference.

Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (565 KB).

Slide 1

Text Description is below the image.

REC Reported Practice Level Challenges to Achieving Meaningful Use

Office of Provider Adoption Support
Dawn Heisey-Grove, MPH
September 10, 2012

Slide 2

Text Description is below the image.

62 RECs Cover 100% of the USA

Initial Program Goal:

100,000 priority primary care providers achieve meaningful use (MU) by 2014.

Every REC:

  • Has a defined service area and specific number of providers.
  • Provides unbiased, practical support throughout process.
  • Serves as two-way pipeline to federal and local resources.

Approach differs by REC:

  • Independent operations.
  • Affiliation with QIOs and universities.
  • Partnership with other Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) grantees (Beacon and health information exchange [HIE]).
  • Variety of hospital and payer partnerships.

Image: A map of the United States shows the locations of the 62 RECs.

Slide 3

Text Description is below the image.

Who RECs Are Helping

Image: A pie chart shows a breakdown of providers working with RECs as of March 12, 2012:

  • Private Practice 1- 10 (46,613).
  • Public Hospitals (16,994).
  • Community Health Center (20,834).
  • Practice Consortium (17,591).
  • Rural Health Clinic (3,618).
  • Rural Hospital (1,447).
  • Critical Access Hospital (4,050).
  • Other Underserved Setting (16,592).

Image: A pie chart shows Primary Care Providers (PCPs) in the U.S. Working with RECs (60%) and Not Working with RECs (40%).

Over 120,000 providers:

~ 42% of all PCPs in U.S.
~ 70% of all rural providers
~ 74% of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

*Not shown: 10,000+ specialists.

http://dashboard.healthIT.gov

Slide 4

Text Description is below the image.

Who Works with the RECs?

Image: Two pie charts show specialties working with RECS:

  • Family Practice Providers (52,665).
  • Pediatricians (21361).
  • Internal Medicine Practitioners (29,320).
  • OB-GYNs (14,702).
  • General Practice Providers (5,579).
  • Other Providers (1,665).
  • Geriatricians (882).
  • Adolescent Medicine Providers (222).
  • Gynecologists (926).

Slide 5

Text Description is below the image.

Background

  • In November, 2011, RECs were asked to enter site-level challenges in the CRM.
  • RECs are using the CRM Challenges feature in varying ways:
    • Some are creating a "Challenges" for every site; for those sites on track, they are creating an "On Track" issue.
    • Others are only creating "Challenges" issues for those practices that are stuck in the process.
  • 3 RECs are sending data files to OPAS external to the CRM. Those data are incorporated into these slides.

Slide 6

Text Description is below the image.

Challenges Categories

  • One field captures the stage of adoption for the practice: are they trying to reach AIU [adopt/implement/upgrade or use], or MU?
  • There are then 5 Challenges Types: Practice Issues, Vendor Issues, Attestation Process problems, problems with MU Measures, and an "On Track" classification.
  • Within each of the Challenges Types, there are sub-categories. A definition page is available upon request.

Slide 7

Text Description is below the image.

Primary and Secondary Challenges Categories

Practice Issues

  • Workflow adoption.
  • Provider engagement.
  • Training.
  • Vendor selection.
  • Administrative.
  • Financial.
  • Staffing.

Vendor Issues

  • Upgrade:
    • Delays in Implementation/ Installation.
  • Certification:
    • Reports slow/not available.
    • Training/support materials inadequate/ not available.
  • Lack of vendor support.
  • Technical.
  • Inaccurate reports and/or data.

Attestation Process Issues

  • Calculating patient volume.
  • Medicaid program not up yet.
  • Medicaid technical/administrative.
  • Medicare technical/administrative.

MU Measures

  • Core CQMs.
  • Alternate Core CQMs.
  • Additional CQMs.
  • Each of the Core/Menu Set measure.

Complete list of Challenges categories, including tertiary categories and descriptions of the categories, is available upon request.

Slide 8

Text Description is below the image.

Resolved Challenges: Site Level

  • Challenges can be resolved with at the site level or provider level
  • At the site level, a Challenges would be resolved if:
    • The REC indicates the issue is "Completed."
    • A new issue is created to indicate the site is now on track.
    • An "on track" issue is resolved if a new Challenges issue is created.

Slide 9

Text Description is below the image.

Resolved Challenges: Provider Level

  • At the provider level, all challenges are resolved if the provider receives an MU payment from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
  • Other ways a provider may have a Challenges resolved:
    • Attestation Process issues are resolved when a payment is received from CMS.
    • AIU issues are resolved if an AIU payment is received by CMS.
    • Vendor selection issues are resolved if a provider reaches M2 and the issue was created before the M2 date.
    • All issues except Attestation Process are resolved if a provider reaches M3.
    • All AIU Vendor Issues when the provider reaches M2, provided the issue was created before the M2 date.

Slide 10

Text Description is below the image.

Top Ten Overall Challenge Categories by Number of Providers Impacted

RankSecondary Challenge CategoryRank Last MonthTotal Providers Impacted (% resolved)New reports this month by number of providers (% of total providers with new reports)
1MU Measures14,556 (12%)364 (15%)
2

Provider engagement

23,853 (12%)249 (10%)
3

Administrative practice issues

43,063 (11%)510 (21%)
[Image: A blue ribbon with #1 on it]
4

Vendor selection

32,974 (22%)72 (3%)
5

Workflow adoption

62,081 (10%)76 (3%)
6

Vendor delays in implementation/ installation

51,995 (9%)157 (6%)
7

Medicaid Program not up yet

71,645 (29%)32 (1%)
8

Practice financial issues

101,609 (14%)244 (10%)
9

Vendor EHR reports slow/ not available

81,408 (12%)66 (3%)
10

Practice staffing issues

131,191 (14%)77 (3%)

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. A total of 19,237 challenge Issues have been reported by RECs, impacting 54,101 providers. A total of 1,197 challenge Issues were created between July 1 and August 5, 2012, affecting 3,251 providers. 2,942 providers had challenge issues resolved between July 1 and August 5, 2012.

Slide 11

Text Description is below the image.

Challenge Activity For The Month

Top Ten New Challenge Issues

Secondary Challenge CategoryNumber of Providers (% of total providers with new reports)
Administrative practice issues510 (21%)
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 6 in it]

MU Measures

364 (15%)

Provider engagement

249 (10%)

Practice financial issues

244 (10%)

Vendor delays in implementation / installation

157 (6%)

Vendor EHR reports slow/ not available

95 (4%)

Staffing

77 (3%)

Workflow adoption

76 (3%)
Medicare technical issues75 (3%)

Vendor selection

72 (3%)

Top Ten Resolved Challenges

Secondary Challenge Category

Number of Providers (% of total providers impacted by secondary category)

Vendor selection

192 (13%)

MU Measures

159 (11%)

Provider engagement

124 (8%)

Vendor EHR reports slow/ not available

109 (7%)

Administrative practice issues

95 (6%)

Vendor upgrades

76 (5%)

Practice staffing issues

67 (5%)

Vendor delays in implementation / installation

60 (4%)

Medicaid program not up yet

59 (4%)

Workflow adoption

54 (4%)

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. A total of 1,197 challenge issues were created between July 1 and August 5, 2012, affecting 3,251 providers. 2,942 providers had challenge issues resolved between July 1 and August 5, 2012. The green circle represents the issue with the most movement this month.

Slide 12

Text Description is below the image.

Overall Top Ten MU Measures-Specific Challenges

RankMeaningful Use MeasureNumber of Providers ImpactedNew Reports this month by number of providers impacted
1Core 13: Clinical Summary1648
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 5 in it]
116 (28%)
2

Menu 7: Medication Reconciliation

8529 (2%)
3

Core 15: Security Review

85115 (4%)
4

Menu 4: Patient Reminders

820
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 7 in it]
6 (1%)
5

Menu 8: Summary Care Record

8027 (2%)
6

Menu 9: Immunization

607
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 5 in it]
11 (3%)
7

Menu 6: Educational Resources

58526 (6%)
8

Core 14: Electronic Exchange

51317 (4%)
9

Core 9: Smoking Status

4901 (0.2%)
10

Core CQMs

4447 (2%)

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. Users may select multiple measure-specific issues as challenges within one report, therefore, these numbers may overestimate the total number of challenge reports for Measure-specific issues. The blue ribbon indicates the top reported issue for the month. The green circle represents the issue with the most movement this month.

Measures to watch:
Core 4 (eRx) is #13 overall this month (down from #8) with 21 (5%) new reports.

Slide 13

Text Description is below the image.

Top Ten Newly Reported MU Measures-Specific Challenges: July 1-August 5, 2012

RankMeaningful Use Measure

New Reports this month, by number of providers impacted

Percent of total monthly providers impacted

1Core 13: Clinical Summary11628%
2

Core 9: Smoking Status

6215%
3

Core 8: Vital Signs

379%
4

Menu 6: Educational Resources

266%
5

Core 4: eRx

215%
6

Core 14: Electronic Exchange

174%
7

Core 15: Security Review

154%
8

Additional CQMs

123%
9

Menu 9: Immunization

113%
10

Menu 2: Laboratory Tests

102%

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. Users may select multiple measure-specific issues as challenges within one report, therefore, these numbers may overestimate the total number of challenge reports for Measure-specific issues.

Slide 14

Text Description is below the image.

Top Ten Top Ten Challenge Categories for Providers Trying to Reach MU

RankSecondary Challenge CategoryRank Last MonthTotal Providers Impacted (% resolved)Reports this month (% of total monthly reports)
1MU Measures-specific issues12,859 (8%)109 (14%)
2

Provider engagement

21,533 (5%)124 (16%)
[Image: A blue ribbon with #1 on it]
3

Practice administrative issues

61,133 (3%)96 (13%)
4

Vendor EHR reports slow/ not available

31,064 (5%)16 (2%)
5

Workflow adoption

41,023 (2%)30 (4%)
6

Upgrade

5805 (3%)20 (3%)
7

Vendor delays in implementation/ installation

7565 (0.4%)45 (6%)
8

Practice staffing issues

13
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 13 in it]
538 (1%)64 (8%)
9

Practice financial issues

9526 (2%)8 (1%)
10

Vendor reports and/or data inaccurate

10523 (1%)39 (5%)

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. MU refers to the implementation phase the site is at for their EHR. A total of 11,991 providers have MU challenge Issues. The green circle represents the issue with the most movement this month; the blue ribbon indicates the top reported challenge for the month.

Slide 15

Text Description is below the image.

Top Ten Newly Reported Challenge Categories for Providers Trying to Reach MU: July 1-August 5, 2012

RankSecondary Challenge CategoryRank Last MonthTotal Providers Impacted

Percent of total monthly providers impacted

1

Provider engagement

212416%
2

MU Measures

110914%
3

Administrative practice issues

69613%
4

Practice staffing issues

7648%
5

Medicare technical issues

17
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 12 in it]
537%
6

Vendor delays in implementation/ installation

3456%
7

Vendor reports and/or data inaccurate

9395%
8

Practice staff training

4324%
9

Workflow adoption

5304%
10

Upgrade

15
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 5 in it]
203%

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. MU refers to the implementation phase the site is at for their EHR. A total of 2,773 providers have newly reported MU challenge Issues between July 1-August 5, 2012. The green circle represents the issue with the most movement this month.

Slide 16

Text Description is below the image.

Challenge and On Track Reports by Site

Images: A pie chart shows proportion of sites with challenge/on track reports:

  • On Track Report: 8%.
  • Barrier Issue: 13%.
  • No Barrier Issue: 79%.

A bar graph shows number of reports per site. 84% of sites have only 1 challenge/on track issue reported.

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. 15,983 sites are represented in 19,237 challenge reports. Each site in the CRM may have multiple challenge issues created for it.

Slide 17

Text Description is below the image.

Overall Monthly Challenge Activity

Image: A bar graph shows monthly challenge activity from November 2011 to August 2012. Activity was highest in March and June 2012.

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. A total of 19,237 challenge Issues have been reported by RECs.

Slide 18

Text Description is below the image.

Proportion of Providers Impacted by Challenge Types as Reported in CRM

Image: A pie chart shows unresolved challenge issues:

  • Practice Issues: 50%.
  • Vendor Issues: 25%.
  • MU Measures: 13%.
  • Attestation Process: 12%.

Resolved Challenge Issues

IssuePercent Resolved
Attestation Process29
MU Measures12.3
Practice Issues13.7
Vendor Issues15.99

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. 43,906 providers have open challenge issues; 33% (14,420) of those are on track. 10,195 providers have resolved issues.

Slide 19

Text Description is below the image.

Practice Issue Challenges

Images: A pie chart shows unresolved practice issue challenges:

  • Administrative: 15%.
  • Financial: 10%.
  • Provider Engagement: 21%.
  • Workflow Adoption: 10%.
  • Vendor Selection: 31%.
  • Staffing: 8%.
  • Training: 5%.

A bar graph shows resolved practice issue challenges by number of providers from November 2011 to August 2012.

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. A total of 17,015 providers have a practice issue challenges report; 1,425 (8%) do not have a sub-category. 2,337 (14%) providers have practice issues that have been resolved.

Slide 20

Text Description is below the image.

Vendor Issue Challenges

Images: A pie chart shows unresolved vendor issue challenges:

  • Delays in Implementation/ Installation: 27%.
  • Inaccurate Reports and/or Data: 11%.
  • Certification: 12%.
  • Lack of Support: 3%.
  • Reports Slow/Not Available: 16%.
  • Technical: 12%.
  • Training/Support Materials: 4%.
  • Upgrade: 15%.
  • Vendor Selection: 0%.

A bar graph shows resolved vendor issue challenges from November 2011 to August 2012.

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. A total of 8,737 providers have a vendor issue challenge report ; 825 (9%) do not have a sub-category. 1,385 (16%) providers have resolved vendor issue challenges.

Slide 21

Text Description is below the image.

Attestation Process Challenges

Images: A pie chart shows unresolved attestation process issues:

  • Medicaid Program Not Up Yet: 34%.
  • No Sub-Type: 26%.
  • Medicaid: 19%.
  • Medicare: 15%.
  • Calculate Patient Volume: 6%.

A bar graph shows resolved attestation process issues from November 2011 to August 2012.

Data as of August 5, 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. A total of 4,878 providers have an attestation process challenge report; 1,230 (25%) do not have a sub-category. 1,419 (29%) providers have a resolved attestation process issue.

Slide 22

Text Description is below the image.

Top Five Challenges by Practice Type

RankCHCsCAHsOther Undeserved
Setting
Practice
Consortium
Private
Practice 1-10
Private
Practice 11+
Public
Hospitals
Rural Health ClinicRural HospitalsSpecialty
Practice
1MU Measures*Practice staffing***MU Measures*Practice Administrative***Provider Engagement***Practice financial issues***Vendor delays in Implementation/ Installation****Provider Engagement***Practice administrative***Medicaid program not up yet**
2Practice Administrative***Practice Administrative***Workflow adoption***Vendor selection****Vendor selection****Provider Engagement***Provider Engagement***MU Measures*MU Measures*MU Measures*
3Vendor delays in Implementation/ Installation****MU Measures*Provider engagement***MU Measures*MU Measures*Medicaid program not up yet**Practice Administrative***Practice financial issues***Vendor technical****Vendor selection****
4Medicaid program not up yet**Practice financial issues***Practice Administrative***Training/support materials*Practice Administrative***MU Measures*Medicaid program not up yet**Practice administrative***Vendor upgrade****Vendor upgrade****
5Medicaid technical issues**Workflow adoption***Vendor delays in Implementation/ Installation****Provider Engagement***Practice financial issues***Medicare technical issues**Vendor selection****Vendor selection****Medicaid calculate patient volume**Provider Engagement***

* MU Measures
** Attestation Process
*** Practice Issue
**** Vendor Issue

Data as of August 5 2012, pulled from the ONC CRM. Non-priority hospitals did not report any challenges.

Slide 23

Text Description is below the image.

Top Five MU Measures-Specific Challenges by Practice Type

RankCHCsCAHsOther Undeserved SettingPractice ConsortiumPrivate Practice 1-10Public HospitalsRural HospitalRural Health ClinicSpecialty Practice
1Core 15: Security ReviewMenu 4: Patient RemindersCore 13: Clinical SummaryCore 15: Security ReviewCore 13: Clinical SummaryCore CQMsCore 8: Vital SignsCore 4: eRxCore 9: Smoking Status
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 9 in it]
2Menu 9: ImmunizationCore 13: Clinical SummaryMenu 8: Summary Care RecordCore 13: Clinical SummaryCore 15: Security ReviewCore 13: Clinical SummaryCore 9: Smoking StatusCore 13: Clinical Summary
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 6 in it]
Core 4: eRx
3Menu 5: Electronic AccessMenu 8: Summary Care RecordMenu 4: Patient RemindersCore 14: Electronic ExchangeMenu 9: ImmunizationCore 1: CPOEN/ACore CQMsCore 13: Clinical Summary
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 8 in it]
4Core 4: eRxMenu 7: Medication ReconciliationMenu 7: Medication ReconciliationCore 11: Implement CDS
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 5 in it]
Core 14: Electronic ExchangeCore 9: Smoking StatusN/AAdditional CQMsCore 15: Security Review
5Core 12: Electronic CopyMenu 6: Educational ResourcesMenu 6: Educational ResourcesCore 9: Smoking StatusCore 9: Smoking StatusCore 4: eRxN/ACore 10: Reporting Ambulatory CQMsCore 5: Active Medication List
[Image: A green circle contains an arrow pointing up with the number 11 in it]

Data as of August 5, 2012,pulled from ONC CRM, Private Practices >10 and non-priority hospitals did not report any MU Measures challenges.
Users may select multiple measure-specific issues as challenges within one report, therefore, these numbers may overestimate the total number of challenge reports for Measure-specific issues.
Green arrows indicate measures with significant upward movement in the rankings.

Page last reviewed December 2012
Internet Citation: Regional Extension Centers (REC) Reported Practice Level Challenges to Achieving Meaningful Use: AHRQ's 2012 Annual Conference Slide Presentation. December 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://archive.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2012/track_f/92_dimitropoulos_et-al/heisey.html

 

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care