Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Modeling Risk and Reducing Liability through Better Communication and Teamwork

AHRQ's 2012 Annual Conference Slide Presentation

On September 11, 2012, David Baker made this presentation at the 2012 Annual Conference.

Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (570 KB).

Slide 1

Text Description is below the image.

Modeling Risk and Reducing Liability through Better Communication and Teamwork

David P. Baker, PhD
IMPAQ International, LLC

Slide 2

Text Description is below the image.

Overview

  • Preparing for Demonstration Grant (R21).
  • Research Team:
    • David P. Baker, PhD (Principal Investigator).
    • Patrice Weiss, MD (Co-Investigator).
    • Laurie Spotswood, MSEd, CLS (Research Specialist).
    • Tony Slonim, MD, DPH (Co-Investigator).

Slide 3

Text Description is below the image.

Background

  • Relations between lawsuits, payouts, and negligence is muddy at best.
  • The Harvard Malpractice Study:
    • Reviewed 30,000 hospital records.
    • Found the incidence of malpractice was much larger than the incidence of claims.
  • Ineffective communication between patients/families and clinicians yield lawsuits.
  • Patients/families are viewed as critical members of the care team
    • TeamSTEPPS® introduced by AHRQ for clinician teamwork.
    • Little work on how to include/train patients/families.

Slide 4

Text Description is below the image.

Study Aims

  • Aim 1: To identify clinical events that are highly dependent on provider teamwork, require patient/ families to be effective members of the team, and vary in terms of risk and liability.
  • Aim 2: To identify the root causes of these events, including where critical teamwork breakdowns occur.
  • Aim 3: To conduct a series of focus groups to ascertain how patient/family and provider communication should occur to mitigate risk and reduce liability and to identify TeamSTEPPS tools that could be used to enable patients/families to be more effective members of the care team.
  • Aim 4: To develop and pilot test a TeamSTEPPS intervention(s) that teaches patients/families how to be members of the care team and enhances communication between patients/families and providers.

Slide 5

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 1

  • Goal:
    • Identify and select events that require teamwork and vary in terms of risk and liability in Labor and Delivery (L&D).
  • Approach
    • Reviewed RAND (2008) report and identified candidate events that require teamwork.
    • Identified 18 candidate events in L&D.
    • Surveyed 10 clinical experts:
      • Degree of Risk.
      • Likelihood of Liability.
      • Requirement for Teamwork.

Slide 6

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 1 Results

 Liability
HighLow
Risk
HighShoulder Dystocia
Birth Trauma—Injury to Neonate—Vaginal Birth
Post-Partum
Hemorrhage
LowMaternal Death
Intra-partum Fetal Death
Uterine Rupture
Unplanned Admission to ICU (Mother or Baby)
Unplanned Return to LD or OR

Slide 7

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 2

  • Goal
    • Identify the root causes of these events, including where critical teamwork breakdowns occur:
      • Root causes included: (1) risk factors; (2) individual, team, & systems factors; (3) clinical team members; and (4) patient and family responsibilities.
      • Divided L&D into six phases: (1) pre-hospital; (2) triage/ assessment; (3) monitoring/laboring; (4) delivery; (5) post-partum L&D; and (6) post-partum mother baby unit.
  • Approach
    • Two phases of key informant interviews with clinical staff:
      • Phase I—Identify events (12 interviews).
      • Phase II—Validate events (11 interviews).
    • Identified common root causes across all four events (identified during Aim 1).

Slide 8

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 2 Results

 Common Failures

Triage/Assessment
Clinician does not sufficiently educate patient/family about risks.
Clinicians do not collect adequate information on patient's history.
Patient/family does not provide adequate/honest information on patient's history.
Clinician does not properly record patient's history.
Clinicians do not understand patient or patient's family due to a language barrier.
Clinician does not conduct an interview with patient privately to identify any important factors patient does not wish to be shared with other family members/father.

Slide 9

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 2 Results

 Common Patient and Family Responsibilities

Triage/Assessment
Provide accurate patient history by describing any past problems.
Patient/family should ask questions about the plan of care.
Patient/family should voice any concerns about the plan of care.
Patient/family can cooperate with clinician requests.
Ensures patient is compliant with her prescribed plan of care.
Patient/family can be aware of and follow hospital rules.

Slide 10

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 3

  • Goal
    • Collect information from patients and family members in order to:
      • Verify patient and family responsibilities.
      • Identify the root causes per event that patients would want disclosed and clinical staff would feel should be disclosed.
      • Identify TeamSTEPPS tools and strategies patients would find useful.
  • Approach
    • Four patient and family focus groups; one per L&D event:
      • Verified the patient and family responsibilities clinicians identified.
      • Facilitated discussion about what patients and families want clinicians to disclose.
      • Conducted disclosure survey of patients and providers focused on the different events.
      • Reviewed and discussed TeamSTEPPS tools.
    • 47 patient and family members; 13 clinicians.

Slide 11

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 3 Results
Patient Mean Disclosure Ratings

PhaseFailureUnplanned ReturnShoulder DystociaPost-partum Hem.Intra-partum Fetal Death
Triage/AssessmentClinicians do not assess if mother is compliant with expectations for prenatal care3.23.413.223.3
Triage/AssessmentMother's information is documented in different places (i.e., paper and electronic)3.94.184.333.7
Triage/AssessmentPhysician and nursing documentation procedures differ3.23.533.782.7
Triage/AssessmentClinician does not verbally communicate plan of care to nursing (not just electronically)3.12.242.112.4
Triage/AssessmentPrenatal records are not available or missing2.61.351.562.2

Slide 12

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 3 Results
Clinician Mean Disclosure Ratings

PhaseDescriptionUnplanned ReturnShoulder DystociaPost-partum Hem.Intra-partum Fetal Death
Triage/AssessmentClinicians do not assess if mother is compliant with expectations for prenatal care2.7455
Triage/AssessmentMother's information is documented in different places (i.e., paper and electronic)2.71.673.672.33
Triage/AssessmentPhysician and nursing documentation procedures differ34.331.673
Triage/AssessmentClinician does not verbally communicate plan of care to nursing (not just electronically)3.73.672.332.33
Triage/AssessmentPrenatal records are not available or missing31.332.332.33

Slide 13

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 3 Results
Correlations between Clinician and Patient Disclosure Ratings

PhaseUnplanned
Return to L&D
Shoulder DystociaPost-partum Hem.Intra-partum
Fetal Death
Pre-Hospital0.21-0.080.890.62
Triage/Assessment-0.370.280.300.37
Monitoring/Laboring0.80-0.080.550.30
Delivery0.710.860.280.96
Post-partum L&D0.650.390.740.12
Across All Phases0.700.190.570.48

Slide 14

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 4

  • Goal
    • To develop and pilot test a TeamSTEPPS intervention(s) that teaches patients/families how to be members of the care team and enhances communication between patients/families and providers.
  • Approach:
    • Developed a 45-minute, patient and family oriented TeamSTEPPS module for L&D.
    • 28 participants.
    • Collected pre-post data on participant reactions and learning:
      • Reactions: instrumentality and affective.
      • Learning: attitudes (T-TAQ) and knowledge (Learning Benchmarks).

Slide 15

Text Description is below the image.

TeamSTEPPS Training Objectives

  • Describe how the patient and family fits into the clinical team.
  • Describe the patient and family responsibilities as team members.
  • Describe the clinical team member roles and responsibilities.
  • Describe the core components of team leadership, assertion, and communication.
  • Describe TeamSTEPPS tools that can be used by patients:
    • Briefs, Huddles and Debriefs.
    • Assertive Statement and Two-Challenge Rule.
    • SBAR and Check Back.

Slide 16

Text Description is below the image.

Aim 4—Results

  • Reactions
    • Overall mean rating was 4.18, on a 5-point scale:
      • "This training would be appropriate for patients in all care settings."
      • "This training should be offered by …. in the future."
  • Learning:
    • Attitudes:
      • Pre-training Mean (4.51).
      • Post-training Mean (4.55).
    • Learning:
      • Pre-training Mean (10.86 items correct).
      • Post-training Mean (12.28 items correct).

Slide 17

Text Description is below the image.

Conclusions

  • Clinicians generally showed high agreement when assessing the degree of risk, liability, and teamwork associated with specific clinical events in L&D.
  • Regardless how events varied in terms of risk and liability, the individual, team, and system failures were generally common across events.
  • Patients/family members were found to agree about which failures were important to disclose, and type of adverse event did not affect these results.
  • Clinicians on the other hand showed far more variability regarding what should be disclosed, and these results did appear to be affected by adverse event type.
  • Patients/families like TeamSTEPPS, intended to use the tools taught, would recommend the training to others, and showed gains in knowledge.

Slide 18

Text Description is below the image.

Next Steps

  • Negotiating with an implementation site.
  • Examine transfer of the trained skills.
  • Determine if there is a relation to clinical outcomes.
Page last reviewed December 2012
Internet Citation: Modeling Risk and Reducing Liability through Better Communication and Teamwork: AHRQ's 2012 Annual Conference Slide Presentation. December 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://archive.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2012/track_a/101_baker_gallagher/baker.html

 

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care