Building National Health Care Quality Improvement Campaigns to Succeed: Lessons from the CUSP: CLABSI Project (Text Version)
On September 27, 2010, Stephen Hines made this presentation at the 2010 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (715 KB).
Slide 1
Building National Health Care Quality Improvement Campaigns to Succeed: Lessons from the CUSP: CLABSI Project
AHRQ Annual Meeting
Sept. 27, 2010
Steve Hines, PhD
Health Research and Educational Trust
Slide 2
Presentation Overview
- CUSP: CLABSI Project Origins and Background.
- The Challenge of Evolving a National Project.
- Implications for Project Design and Planning.
- Final Thoughts.
Slide 3
Project Origins and Background
- In the beginning was the Keystone Project...
- ...and it was very good!
An image of the Michelangelo Sistine Chapel painting and the map of Michigan is shown.
Slide 4
CUSP: CLABSI Project Rationale
- Blood stream infections kill 40,000-60,000 persons each year.
- Reducing the BSI rate from 5 per 1,000 days to 1 per 1,000 days will save 20,000 lives annually.
- Michigan Keystone Project showed that this level of reduced CLABSI rate was achievable and sustainable.
- Project made central part of Secretary Sibelius' Healthcare Acquired Infection Reduction Initiative.
Slide 5
CUSP: CLABSI Project Goals
- Outcome Goals:
- Reduce BSIs to 1 per 1,000 central line days.
- Some states and hospitals view CLABSI elimination as the goal.
- Improve unit safety culture.
- Reach hospitals in all 50 states, the District and Puerto Rico.
- Include both ICUs and other units with CLABSI risks.
- Include critical access hospitals.
Slide 6
CUSP: CLABSI Implementation Content
CUSP
- Educate on the science of safety.
- Identify defects.
- Assign executive to adopt unit.
- Learn from defects.
- Implement teamwork and communication tools.
CLASBI
- Wash hands prior to procedure.
- Use maximal barrier precautions.
- Clean skin with chlorhexidine.
- Avoid femoral lines.
- Remove unnecessary lines.
Slide 7
CUSP CLABSI Intervention Processes
Individual Components
- Planning/ orientation calls.
- Baseline data collection period for CLABSI and safety culture.
- Kickoff meeting.
- Monthly infection rate and team process data submission.
- Monthly content calls.
- Monthly coaching calls.
- Monthly feedback reports on outcome and process measures.
- Mid-course meeting.
- End-of-project meeting.
Project spans two years and requires participation in:
- 2-3 in-person meetings.
- 48-60 calls led by national project team.
- 24 internal meetings of implementation team.
- Monthly data collection, submission, and assessment (lessons learned/root cause analysis).
Slide 8
The Challenge of Evolving a National QI Project
Slide 9
A Tale of Two Airplanes
| Wright Flyer | P-51 Mustang | |
|---|---|---|
| Design & Build Prototype | 4 years | 117 days |
| Production Time | 6 months for Flyer II & III | 21 minutes at peak |
| Range | 24 miles | 1,100+ miles |
| Speed | 39 mph | 400+ mph |
| Altitude | 200 feet | 30,000+ feet |
Images: A Wright Flyer plane and a P-51 Mustang plane are shown.
Slide 10
Obstacles to Evolving
- Proven initial model: Change distances project from proof method will work.
- Project databases: Stability justifies creating and building a robust national database.
- Evaluation: Simpler and cleaner to assess outcome of a single intervention.
- Project planning: Proposal submission process requires plan easier to execute than to modify.
- Budgets/Contracts: Executed agreements with subcontractors commit resources for specific tasks.
- Clarity: Change creates questions and confusion.
Slide 11
Lessons from Two Airplanes
Change is difficult, risky, but absolutely essential for mass production (or a national rollout to succeed).
Images: A Wright Flyer plane and a P-51 Mustang plane are shown.
Slide 12
Predictable Evolutions in National QI Campaigns
- Key challenge shifts from obtaining proof change is possible to achieving change in specific units.
- Baseline problem level changes from 5 infections per 1,000 central line days to 2-3 infections per 1,000 central line days.
- Goal changes from under 1 infection per 1,000 central line days to total elimination.
Slide 13
Predictable Evolutions in National QI Campaigns
- Participant expectations change from uncertainty of success despite effort to (over)confidence in success with minimal effort.
- Participants change from innovators and early adopters to mid- to late-majority hospitals.
- External environment changes from project as unique and innovative to project as one of many improvement activities in the area.
Slide 14
National QI Campaign Paradoxes
- The more successfully a national QI campaign begins, the more pressure there will be for it to remain unchanged and the more need it will have to evolve quickly and substantially.
- Nothing guarantees failure more than continued, unreflective reliance on the processes that first produced success.
Slide 15
Preparing to Successfully Adapt to Change
| Factors Evolving | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| Challenge Definition | Creating evidence improvement is possible | Practical guidance on achieving improvement |
| Proof rates can be lowered | Proof decreases are sustainable | |
| Baseline Defect Rate | Recognition of a significant problem | Erroneous belief the problem is fixed |
| 3-4 Sigma improvement strategies | 5 Sigma improvement strategies |
Slide 16
Preparing to Successfully Adapt to Change
| Factors Evolving | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| Project Goals | Significant reduction | Complete eradication |
| Achieving superior performance | Avoiding inferior, substandard care | |
| Participant expectations | Change is doubtful, long, and hard | Change should be fast and simple |
| Comprehensive and redundant training | Efficient, streamlined training | |
| Dependence on project leadership for success | Dependence on internal and local leadership for success |
Slide 17
Preparing to Successfully Adapt to Change
| Factors Evolving | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | Innovators and early adopters | Mid and late majority and laggards |
| Proof from national experts and visionaries | Proof from local and regional leaders | |
| External Environment | Project is unique, exciting, and cutting edge | Project is one route to success among many |
| Few implementation activities have occurred | Partial interventions have occurred in many places | |
| Coordination with alternate projects irrelevant | Coordination with alternate projects essential | |
| Belief problem is unfixable independently | Belief problem can be fixed without external help |
Slide 18
Implications for Leaders of National QI Campaigns and Funding Organizations
- Proposal Evaluation.
- Budgeting.
- Goal Setting.
- Project Leadership.
- Operational Processes.
- Data Bases.
- Evaluation.
Slide 19
Implications for Leaders of National QI Campaigns and Funding Organizations: Key Questions
| Project Dimension | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| Proposal Writing & Evaluation | Is it a viable, proven plan? | What is the plan for adapting to inevitable change? |
| Budgeting | Are all resources allocated to good causes? | Are resources fungible and are unallocated resources retained to support needed adjustments? |
| Goal Setting | What outcome goals are set at the outset? | Are change goals defined and outcome goals adjusted? |
Slide 20
Implications for Leaders of National QI Campaigns and Funding Organizations: Key Questions
| Project Dimension | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| Project Leadership | Does project have stable, credible leadership? | Does project have a plan to develop and transition to new, local or regional leaders? |
| Operational Processes | Are processes well defined and proven? | How will processes become faster and more efficient? |
| Data bases | Will stable, robust databases be created? | Can databases inexpensively evolve to reflect needed changes? |
| Evaluation | Were processes followed and outcomes achieved? | Did processes evolve to achieve outcomes more efficiently? |
Slide 21
Final Thoughts
- Critical to distinguish between essential success factors and processes for helping hospitals implement them.
- Success factors for CUSP: CLABSI
- Culture change that makes safety a priority and empowers every employee to hold every other employee accountable for safety.
- Operational changes that reduce infections.
- Processes likely to morph: Set of meetings and calls used to educate, motivate, and empower unit staff to implement CUSP: CLABSI.
- Success factors for CUSP: CLABSI
Slide 22
Final Thoughts
- Critical to recognize inherent tensions in national campaigns:
- Consistency & clarity vs. need to change.
- Strong national leadership vs. flexible local leadership.
- Design that supports strong, clean evaluation of impact vs. design that maximizes operational impact.
- Processes likely to morph: Set of meetings and calls used to educate, motivate, and empower unit staff to implement CUSP: CLABSI.
- More research and reflection required on how to make national campaigns successful and efficient (e.g. Scale Up & Spread Conference funded by AHRQ, Commonwealth Fund & others.
Slide 23
Final Thoughts
- Need to account for context in planning and executing a campaign:
- Inevitable that parts of campaign will not take place in ideal context.
- Could be ideal when funded, less enthusiasm during implementation.
- Could be ideal at kickoff, but requires visionary funder that correctly times the trend.
- Need strategies for both directly influencing participants and for shaping the national environment to support campaign's goals.
- Inevitable that parts of campaign will not take place in ideal context.
Slide 24
Questions
- About presentation:
- Steve Hines
shines3@aha.org
312-422-2607
- Steve Hines
- About participating in CUSP: CAUTI or CUSP:CLABSI
- dbohr@aha.org
646-678-4280
- dbohr@aha.org
Disclaimer: Although the CUSP: CLABSI project is funded by AHRQ and is being led by a partnership that includes Johns Hopkins University and the Michigan Health and Hospital Association, the opinions in this presentation are exclusively those of the presenter. Like an effective national campaign, these views are also likely to evolve over time.


5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857