This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Methods and Measures
Assessing Pediatric Quality of Life in a Clinical Trial
Grant/Contract Number: HS09123
Project Period: 06/96-05/98
Principal Investigator: Robert D. Annett, Ph.D.
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 87131-5311
Purpose: To examine the relationship between a general multidimensional approach to quality of
life measurement and a disease-specific approach to measuring quality of life in asthmatic children.
Two different methods of assessing quality of life are being examined by administering the
Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQLQ) to asthmatic children and parents at the 12-month
followup visit at five of the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) centers. The
PQLQ administration is occurring in conjunction with the administration of the current CAMP
quality of life questionnaire battery and other clinical information obtained at each visit, allowing
the investigators to examine disease-specific quality of life in the context of the multidimensional
measures currently employed in CAMP. This study employs discriminant function analyses in the
data analysis.
Improving Efficiency and Quality with Information
Systems
Grant/Contract Number: HS08297
Project Period: 07/94-06/96
Principal Investigator: David W. Bates, M.D., M.Sc.
Institution: Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of an information system
for improving the use of
ancillary tests, measure the impact of actively promoting patient
specific information and
probabilities designed to improve the quality of therapy, and
investigate ways in which
information systems may help organizations monitor quality
through a series of randomized
controlled trials. This study should lead to improved quality
and efficiency in giving providers
information and feedback at the time orders are written.
Randomized Trial Comparing Masked/Unmasked Meta-Analysis
Grant/Contract Number: HS07728
Project Period: 07/93-12/95
Principal Investigator: Jesse A. Berlin, Sc.D.
Institution: University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021
Purpose: To answer an important methodological question about
the effect of "blinding" in
meta-analysis. The investigators compared results of two meta-analyses of the same set of
randomized controlled trials. In the first meta-analysis,
information that would reveal the identity
of the included studies was provided to reviewers; in the second,
reviewers were blinded to all
identifying information. This randomized trial tested the
hypothesis that blinding of reviewers,
often difficult and expensive to do, leads to systematic
differences in the results of meta-analysis.
Health Outcome Measurement in Nursing Homes
Grant/Contract Number: HS07585
Project Period: 09/93-03/96
Principal Investigator: Francis G. Caro, Ph.D.
Institution: University of Massachusetts
Boston, MA 02125-3393
Purpose: To develop a quality assurance methodology that is
focused on patient outcomes for
nursing homes in Massachusetts. The project developed facility
level health outcome measures
for nursing homes adjusted for patient characteristics. It was a
first step in creating an analytic
research file and analytic framework that can be used on a
continuing basis to improve the
quality of nursing home care in Massachusetts as well as in other
States.
Multi-Institutional Test Bed for Clinical
Vocabulary
Grant/Contract Number: HS08751
Project Period: 09/94-09/97
Principal Investigator: Christopher G. Chute, M.D.
Institution: Mayo Foundation
Rochester, MN 55905
Purpose: To strengthen electronic medical records systems by
maintaining terminology models
between and within the Mayo Foundation and Kaiser Permanente
using relational tools and
evaluating more sophisticated tools. The study measures the
relative merits of terminology
additions and changes as they affect guideline development and
patient data retrieval. It also
evaluates the impact of terminology variants on physician
practice and satisfaction.
A Model of Patients' Preferences in Serious
Illness
Grant/Contract Number: HS06754
Project Period: 08/91-01/94
Principal Investigator: Neal V. Dawson, M.D.
Institution: Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, OH 44109-1998
Purpose: To (1) determine how seriously ill patients value
commonly occurring symptoms and
health outcomes, (2) estimate the effect of patient experiences
with symptoms and health
outcomes upon the values or preferences they associated with
these variables, and (3) develop a
common metric of patient utility. The results of this study will
inform judgments made for
patients who are unable to make judgments for themselves and
inform policy decisions that may
influence the care of seriously ill patients. Patients rated 21
sets of attributes (scenarios), and
additional demographic and experiential data were collected. A
composite patient preference
model (CPPM) was derived by using conjoint analysis.
Validating Risk Prediction Models in Cardiology
Grant/Contract Number: HS08805
Project Period: 09/95 09/97
Principal Investigator: Elizabeth R. DeLong, Ph.D.
Institution: Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC 27710 7510
Purpose: To test and develop methods to validate risk prediction
models in cardiology. Using
data from Duke, Minnesota, New York, Northern New England, HCFA,
and Oklahoma, this
investigation will develop validation strategies and apply them
concurrently to existing models
and datasets. While the methodology will primarily be
implemented in the area of cardiology,
the results should be applicable to other health care areas.
Using Outcomes to Assess Quality: Do Readmissions Matter?
Grant/Contract Number: HS06331
Project Period: 04/92-05/96
Principal Investigator: Arnold M. Epstein, M.D., M.A.
Institution: Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To determine whether readmission outcomes can be used to assess the quality of
hospital care received by patients. Related Adverse Readmissions (RARs), defined as
readmissions potentially related to less than optimal care during the initial hospitalization, were
specified for patients recently treated for pneumonia and congestive heart failure. The project
tested whether RARs can be used reliably to identify patients who may have received lower
quality care. Quality of care on the index admission is being assessed to validate the relationship
between quality of care and RARs. The study also solicited expert opinions.
Ongoing Development and Evaluation of HEDIS Measures
Grant/Contract Number: HS09473
Project Period: 09/96-09/99
Principal Investigator: Arnold M. Epstein, M.D.
Institution: Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To suggest a refinement of specific measures and identify important problems with
individual indicators in the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) based on a
rigorous and broad evaluation of HEDIS 3.0. Specifically, investigators will evaluate the new
"reporting set" measures in HEDIS 3.0 and a subset of the original "reporting set" measures with
respect to their relevance for users, the soundness of the science that underlies them, and the
feasibility of implementing them. The study will develop and evaluate complete operational
specifications for a subset of "testing set" measures that are particularly strong candidates for the
next version of HEDIS.
Linking Health Databases: A Blueprint for Action
Grant/Contract Number: HS06639
Project Period: 05/91-04/92
Principal Investigator: Mark Epstein, Sc.D., M.S.P.H.
Institution: National Association of Health Data
Organizations
Falls Church, VA 22046-4517
Purpose: To address the feasibility of linking public and
private research related health
databases. The study identified major research related databases
maintained in the public and
private sectors and provided health services researchers with
useful information on the statistical
characteristics of existing databases and the type of data
available. The project also revised its
Resource Manual on State health data organizations for use by
health researchers.
Longitudinal Comparison of Measures for Health Outcomes
Grant/Contract Number: HS06491
Project Period: 09/90-02/96
Principal Investigator: Dennis G. Fryback, Ph.D.
Institution: University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706
Purpose: To conduct a population-based longitudinal study of older adults to determine the
relationship between two measures of health status: the Short Form General Health Survey used
in the Medical Outcomes Study and the Quality of Well-Being scale. The resulting data gave
population-based estimates of the relationships between two major measures of health status and
estimate age- and sex-specific interval changes in these measures. They also provided
population-based views on quality of life and changes in individual viewpoints.
Equation-Based Severity Measures for
Revascularizations
Grant/Contract Number: HS06285
Project Period: 04/93-03/96
Principal Investigator: Arthur A. Hartz, M.D., Ph.D.
Institution: Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, WI 53226
Purpose: To evaluate equation-based severity of illness measures
for patients having coronary
artery bypass surgery or angioplasty to determine whether they
can be improved, whether they
are stable over time and over geographic region, and whether they
are associated with risk
adjusted patient outcomes after hospital discharge. The
association of risk-adjusted outcomes
with possible determinants of quality of care are being tested in
a pilot study. Five types of data
are being analyzed for this study.
Screening Quality of Care Using Administrative
Data
Grant/Contract Number: HS09099
Project Period: 05/95-04/98
Principal Investigator: Lisa I. Iezzoni, M.D.
Institution: Beth Israel Hospital
Boston, MA 02215
Purpose: To examine three questions addressing different
dimensions of validity of the
Complications Screening Program (CSP) developed by the
investigators (see HS06512): (1)HS06512 Do hospitals code diagnoses
and procedures
completely and accurately in their
discharge abstracts? (2) Are the CSP assumptions from discharge
abstract data, used in
judgments about potential quality problems, correct? (3) Are
individual cases flagged by the
CSP as potentially problematic more likely to have quality
problems than other cases?
Screening Inpatient Quality Using Postdischarge Events
Grant/Contract Number: HS08248
Project Period: 09/94-03/97
Principal Investigator: Lisa I. Iezzoni, M.D.
Institution: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, MA 02215
Purpose: To develop computerized algorithms to screen hospitals for potentially substandard
care using readily available administrative data pertaining to the inpatient stay and outpatient and
other nonacute care in the period immediately following discharge. This study seeks to create the
CSP-O, which is the outpatient version of the Complications Screening Program, and to examine
the results of applying the CSP-O to a Medicare Part A and B administrative data file including all
elderly Medicare admissions to a stratified random sample of 500 acute care hospitals.
Evaluating Severity Adjustors for Patient Outcome
Studies
Grant/Contract Number:HS06742
Project Period: 09/91-09/94
Principal Investigator: Lisa I. Iezzoni, M.D.
Institution: Beth Israel Hospital
Boston, MA 02215
Purpose: To compare nine different severity indexes for
predicting resource use, mortality in the
hospital and post- discharge, and in hospital complications; and
to look at the impact of different
risk-adjustment strategies on perceptions about the outcomes of
care. Results of this study
detailed important considerations for choosing among severity
measurement systems for
different research objectives, particularly patient outcome
studies.
Screening Quality of Care Using Administrative
Data
Grant/Contract Number: HS06512
Project Period: 09/90-09/92
Principal Investigator: Lisa I. Iezzoni, M.D.
Institution: Beth Israel Hospital
Boston, MA 02215
Purpose: To develop and evaluate computerized algorithms to
screen for substandard care and
poor outcomes in hospital patients by using readily available
administrative data. This project
delineated screens and evaluated their results by using Uniform
Hospital Discharge Data Set data
from hospitals in Massachusetts and California. This study
provided a tool for examining
hospital quality and patient outcomes by using large
administrative databases and assisted in
targeting more efficient chart-based reviews of quality and
patient outcome.
Refining the Measurement of Quality of Care
Grant/Contract Number: HS06546
Project Period: 04/91-03/94
Principal Investigator: Katherine L. Kahn, M.D.
Institution: RAND
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
Purpose: To develop reliable and valid measures of the quality
of care for Medicare patients
ages 65 and older. The project answered a series of questions
about clinical epidemiology,
quality of care methods, and health policies using an existing
nationally representative database
of the target population. This project resulted in a series of
manuscripts documenting the
analyses and their implications for future measurement of quality
of care.
Methodologic Studies on APACHE III
Grant/Contract Number: HS05787
Project Period: 01/88-03/92
Principal Investigator: William A. Knaus, M.D.
Institution: George Washington University
Washington, DC 20037
Purpose: To further understand and refine a severity of illness
index, the Acute Physiology and
Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III. This study aimed at
providing physicians, hospitals,
and patients with nationally representative information that
would improve the use and quality of
adult medical surgical intensive care services. The study was
based on information collected
from 16,000 intensive care unit (ICU) admissions from 40 acute
care hospitals and on data on the
structure, management, and process of ICU care at the
hospitals.
Databases for Ambulatory Care Effectiveness Studies
Grant/Contract Number: 290-91-0015
Project Period: 05/91-11/92
Principal Investigator: Selma C. Kunitz, Ph.D.
Institution: Kunitz and Associates, Inc.
Rockville, MD 20852
Purpose: To stimulate and promote research on the effectiveness of medical treatments on
diseases
generally managed on an outpatient basis. This AHCPR project identified and improved access to
extant
databases of ambulatory care medical records. It determined the availability and accessibility of
ambulatory care medical records systems and databases that contain patient descriptors,
treatment, and
outcome information. It also assessed the feasibility of combining existing databases to create a
central
database resource to support research on the effectiveness of medical care. As a result of this
study,
AHCPR published an extensive literature review on ambulatory care records systems entitled
"Automated
Data Sources for Ambulatory Care Effectiveness Research."
Meta-Analytic Techniques for Assessing Valve
Surgery
Grant/Contract Number: HS07566
Project Period: 09/93- 03/95
Principal Investigator: Benjamin Littenberg, M.D.
Institution: Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO 63110-1093
Purpose: To improve the outcome of patients with valvular heart
disease and to expand the use
of meta-analysis beyond the realm of randomized controlled
trials. A meta-analysis of patient
outcomes after valve surgery provided valuable information for
patients and physicians
considering choice of prosthesis. A new statistical method was
then developed and applied to
analyze the data.
Codes and TCP/Toolkits for Exchanging Clinical
Data
Grant/Contract Number: HS08750
Project Period: 09/94-09/97
Principal Investigator: Clement J. McDonald, M.D.
Institution: Indiana University
Indianapolis, IN 46202-2859
Purpose: To eliminate barriers in transferring patient
observations to computer based medical
records systems. The project will develop toolkits for
implementing message standards and
universal codes for identifying distinct test results, clinical
measurements, and sections of
dictated reports transmitted via these standards; develop a
portable set of C++
programs/subroutines for sending and receiving patient
observations between independent
systems using standard medical informatics and Internet
protocols; and develop naming
conventions and assign a fully specified name and code for each
unique laboratory result, most
clinical measurements, and components of narrative clinical
reports.
Adult Global Quality Assessment Tool
Grant/Contract Number: HS09463
Project Period: 09/96-09/99
Principal Investigator: Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Ph.D.
Institution: RAND Corporation
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
Purpose: To develop a more comprehensive approach to quality assessment than has been
previously
designed. Specifically, researchers will (1) synthesize evidence about the effectiveness of
interventions for
15 20 important conditions; (2) develop draft, evidence-based quality of care criteria in each
clinical area;
(3) conduct formal expert panels to select indicators; (4) design and pilot test a computerized data
collection
method that uses enrollment and administrative data to select an enriched random sample of
enrollees; (5)
field test the data collection methods on enrollees from four managed care plans; (6) evaluate the
utility of
the method for distinguishing among health plans; and (7) produce and disseminate a tool—applicable to
the entire population—for implementation by health plans, accrediting bodies, and other
researchers.
History of the Randomized Clinical Trial
Grant/Contract Number: HS06792
Project Period: 09/90-08/91
Principal Investigator: Marcia L. Meldrum, M.B.A., M.A.
Institution: State University of New York
Stony Brook, NY 11794-4348
Purpose: To investigate the process that led to the acceptance
of randomized clinical trials
(RCTs) as the "gold standard" for the evaluation of effectiveness
of medical products and
procedures, and to review specific trials of the 1950s and 1960s
and the negotiation process that
framed their planning and implementation. The study tested the
hypothesis that the RCT is not a
static dogma, but a dynamic tool that was crafted and modified to
meet changing medical and
social needs within its history.
Effects of Stressful Life Events on Health
Outcomes
Grant/Contract Number: HS06622
Project Period: 07/90-08/91
Principal Investigator: Lisa S. Meredith, Ph.D., M.A.
Institution: RAND
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
Purpose: To investigate how stressful life events affect health
outcomes of chronically ill elderly
men and women over time and to develop a model for scoring life
events across age groups.
This research used data from the Medical Outcomes Study. The
results of the study had
implications for health care planning, particularly in the area
of resource allocation for the
increasing needs of the elderly.
Hierarchical Statistical Modeling in Health Policy
Research
Grant/Contract Number: HS07118
Project Period: 08/92-07/96
Principal Investigator: Carl Morris, Ph.D.
Institution: Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To accomplish the transfer of a new statistical
development, hierarchical (multilevel)
statistical modeling, to health services, outcomes, and policy
research. Hierarchical models will
provide better inferences for individual units by borrowing
strength of information from the
ensemble. They make it possible to account properly for
different levels and sources of variation
in complex datasets. The findings will be disseminated to the
general community of researchers
via a series of prototype analyses for specific problems.
Meta-Analysis for Medicine: Application and
Methods
Grant/Contract Number: HS05936
Project Period: 07/88-06/94
Principal Investigator: Frederick Mosteller, Ph.D.
Institution: Harvard University
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To carry out new meta-analyses and update previous meta-analyses for certain
diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The project assessed the
quality of clinical trials in health
and medicine by using empirical studies that show how features of
research designs, including
randomization, placebos, blinding, stopping rules, and
multifactorial designs, influence the
reliability of study results. The study contributed to the
knowledge of specific diagnostic
procedures and methods for their evaluation.
Cost Effectiveness of Utility Assessment in
Hypertension
Grant/Contract Number: HS07606
Project Period: 01/93-12/97
Principal Investigator: Robert F. Nease, Jr., Ph.D., M.S.
Institution: Washington University Medical School
St. Louis, MO 63110
Purpose: To apply a formal approach for determining whether
patient preferences should be
incorporated into practice guidelines in the context of mild
hypertension. The study will use a
utility assessment tool to estimate the cost effectiveness of
individualizing treatment
recommendations to account for patient preferences. The
utilities of mildly hypertensive
patients will be incorporated into an existing decision model to
determine the impact of the
variation in patient preferences on the health benefit offered by
medical treatment relative to
monitoring.
Measuring Effectiveness of Clinical Management
Systems
Grant/Contract Number: HS06469
Project Period: 9/90-09/94
Principal Investigator: R. Heather Palmer, M.B., S.M., B.Ch.
Institution: Harvard University
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To develop indicators of the technical quality of care
related to clinical management
systems in primary health care. Questionnaires were made and
mailed to ambulatory care
patients. Indicators were combined into regular reports of
system performance in the areas of
provision of care, completion of workups, implementation of
treatment decisions,
implementation of preventive care, and communication with
patients.
Critical Pathways and Feedback to Improve Quality
Grant/Contract Number: HS08311
Project Period: 07/94-06/97
Principal Investigator: Steven D. Pearson, M.D., M.Sc.
Institution: Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To (1) assess the impact of Critical Pathways on
hospital length of stay, overall
resource utilization, patient satisfaction with care, and
clinical outcomes; and (2) evaluate the
importance of the feedback of variance data as part of a
continuous quality improvement
program by describing the types and sequences of process changes
that occur during the CQI
development cycle.
Risk and Risk Factor Modeling Project
Grant/Contract Number: HS07002
Project Period: 02/92-01/95
Principal Investigator: Louise Russell, Ph.D.
Institution: Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ 08903
Purpose: To develop a comprehensive multivariate model of the
risk of death and other adverse
health outcomes as functions of a common set of important risk
factors, using data from the 1987
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiological
Follow up Study. The
model provided a picture of the impact of different risk factors
on health. It permitted the effects
of a wide variety of interventions against those risk factors to
be estimated in a common
framework so that valid comparisons could be made across
interventions.
Sharing Paperless Records Among Provider
Networks
Grant/Contract Number: HS08749
Project Period: 12/94-11/97
Principal Investigator: Charles Safran, M.D.
Institution: Beth Israel Hospital
Boston, MA 02215
Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the medical record for
inpatients and outpatients can be
rendered entirely paperless, using a computer based online
medical record system (OMR) that
was developed for an office based general medical practice at
Beth Israel Hospital. The study
focuses on the interaction of the provider with the computer
based medical record as well as
sharing of patient records across disciplines, across traditional
inpatient/outpatient boundaries,
and across a geographically dispersed community. The OMR will be
transformed into a
community based medical record that serves medical and surgical
specialty interests as well as
office and hospital based needs. It will serve as a test bed
for the development of a structural
and functional model of a medical record that will provide access
to problem and medication
lists, navigation of a clinical narrative, trigger points for
clinical guideline usage, and patient
summaries.
Combining Different Data Sources to Assess
Treatments
Grant/Contract Number: HS08532
Project Period: 02/95-01/97
Principal Investigator: Christopher H. Schmid, Ph.D.
Institution: New England Medical Center
Boston, MA 02111
Purpose: To enhance and evaluate three major approaches to
combining results from clinical
studies, namely, meta-analysis, super analysis, and meta-regression. These approaches are being
applied to clinical areas such as the impact of the use of
thrombolytic therapy and the treatment
of hypertension and congestive heart failure. The constructed
models are being assessed with
respect to their form of presentation, variable selection,
estimated treatment effect, model
goodness of fit, predictive performance, clinical applicability,
and applicability to health care
policy.
A Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument Impact Trial
Grant/Contract Number: HS07360
Project Period: 02/93-05/95
Principal Investigator: Harry P. Selker, M.D., M.S.P.H.
Institution: New England Medical Center
Boston, MA 02111
Purpose: To test, in a multicenter 17,500-patient controlled clinical trial, the impact of the acute
cardiac ischemia (ACI) Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument (TIPI) electrocardiograph on
(1) reducing unnecessary non-ACI critical care unit admissions; (2) reducing mistaken emergency
department (ED) discharges to home of patients with ACI, especially those with acute myocardial
infarction (AMI); (3) reducing the number of AMI-related complications by improved triage
performance; (4) reducing time from ED presentation to triage; and (5) reducing time to the ED
use of thrombolytic therapy for AMI. In this large prospective test in a wide range of hospitals,
the ACI-TIPI predictions automatically generated by an electrocardiograph accurately predicted
the likelihood of ACI, of AMI, and of ACI-related complications.
Assessing Appropriateness of Expert Panels:
How
Reliable?
Grant/Contract Number: HS07185
Project Period: 09/93-08/96
Principal Investigator: Paul G. Shekelle, M.D., M.P.H.
Institution: RAND
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
Purpose: To test the reliability of expert panels in assessing
the appropriateness and necessity of
medical procedures. These assessments have become increasingly
important to third party
payers, health policy analysts, and practicing clinicians through
their use in the development of
practice guidelines, utilization review guidelines, and quality
assurance guidelines. Three panel
sessions and a mail survey are being conducted in each of two
conditions.
Failure Rate: A New Outcome Measure of
Quality of
Care
Grant/Contract Number:HS06560
Project Period: 02/92-01/95
Principal Investigator: Jeffrey H. Silber, M.D., Ph.D.
Institution: University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Purpose: To further develop and validate the failure rate, a new
outcome measure. The death
rate was dissected into its component parts, the adverse
occurrence rate and the failure rate, in
order to develop improved measures of hospital quality of care.
This study sought to confirm a
previous finding that factors that predict failure are distinct
from those that predict mortality or
adverse occurrence.
Development of a Child Health Status Measure
Grant/Contract Number: HS08829
Project Period: 03/89- 03/00
Principal Investigator: Barbara Starfield, M.D., M.P.H.
Institution: The Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD 21205
Purpose: To produce child health status instruments that comprehensively measure the health and
illness
profile of children aged 5 to 11. During phases I and II, this study will develop a set of
acceptable, reliable,
and valid instruments to assess the health status of children based on 220 parent-child pairs in
urban
Balitmore. Phase III will be devoted to producing the final versions of the instruments, which will
be
systematically tested in geographically distinct populations with different racial and ethnic
backgrounds.
The resulting instruments will permit children's health status and development to be monitored
over time
and in response to health services interventions.
Resource Use in Seriously Ill Medicare
Patients
Grant/Contract Number: HS09129
Project Period: 07/95-06/97
Principal Investigator: Joan M. Teno, M.D., M.S.
Institution: Center to Improve Care of the Dying
Washington, DC 20037
Purpose: To link the Medicare claims files of beneficiaries with
two databases that have
examined both the process of decision making and the outcomes of
illnesses in seriously ill
hospitalized patients in the Study to Understand Prognoses and
Preferences for Outcomes and
Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT) and in hospitalized patients more
than 80 years old
(Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project). The results of the
study will enable the researchers
to perform analyses aimed at informing public policy discussion,
such as examining the
correlates of resource utilization and examining the impact on
resource use of the SUPPORT
intervention and the Patient Self Determination Act.
Statistical Methods for Quality-of-Life Outcomes Research
Grant/Contract Number: HS07767
Project Period: 03/93-02/97
Principal Investigator: Marcia Anne Testa, Ph.D.
Institution: Harvard School of Public Health
Boston, MA 02115
Purpose: To (1) evaluate and analyze current and potential measurement and statistical
techniques used in
quality-of-life-related patient outcomes through a review of the literature; (2) refine existing
analytical and
statistical methodology so that it is appropriate for evaluation of pharmacologic therapies; and (3)
develop
data analysis demonstration projects within major analytical areas by applying selected methods to
existing
quality-of-life clinical trials databases of hypertension, diabetes, and human immunodeficiency
virus.
Community-Based Pharmaceutical Care:
A Controlled Trial
Grant/Contract Number: HS09083
Project Period: 06/96-05/00
Principal Investigator: Morris Weinberger, Ph.D.
VA Medical Center
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Purpose: To develop algorithms to facilitate pharmaceutical care for the treatment of asthma. A
randomized controlled trial, with 460 patients in a pharmacy intervention group and two control
groups,
will be undertaken. The pharmacy intervention group will be provided with patient-specific
clinical
information displayed on their computer workstations when filling prescriptions. This study will
take
advantage of Indiana University's long-standing project to develop an electronic medical record.
Patient
records will be available to the pharmacist from 6 hospitals and 24 free-standing clinics.
Pharmacy records
will also be made available to these linked providers.
Evaluating Outcomes of Hospital Care Using
Claims Data
Grant/Contract Number: HS05745
Project Period: 07/87-02/93
Principal Investigator: John E. Wennberg, M.D., M.P.H.
Institution: Dartmouth Medical School
Hanover, NH 03755-3863
Purpose: To (1) generate descriptive statistics of mortality and
morbidity for the most frequent
index medical admissions and surgical procedures, and to examine
the relationship between
outcomes and hospital characteristics; (2) test the specific
hypotheses concerning the
associations between alternate therapeutic approaches and patient
outcomes for a selected subset
of the frequent medical and surgical hospitalizations; and (3)
validate outcomes for
prostatectomy through a review of patient records. Medicare and
Manitoba Health Commission
claims data were evaluated for their utility in relation to the
first two aims.
Outcome Assessment: Validation of Cognitive
Function
Scale
Grant/Contract Number: HS06530
Project Period: 02/92-12/95
Principal Investigator: Pamela G. Williams Russo, M.D.,
M.P.H.
Institution: Cornell Medical Center
New York, NY 10021
Purpose: To develop a multi-item scale of cognitive functional
status that can be used in practice
and research to evaluate change in cognitive function in the
elderly, and that can be integrated
with other patient centered measurements of functional status and
well being. This study tested
the reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of the scale
and integrated the results with those
obtained using the Medical Outcomes Study instrument (SF-36) and
with formal
neuropsychologic testing.
Return to Contents
Current as of March 1997
AHCPR Pub. No. 97-R047
Internet Citation:
Medical Treatment Effectiveness Program (MEDTEP) Research Projects, 1989-1996. AHCPR Pub. No. 97-R047, March 1997. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD. https://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/medteprp/